Self-check
Your score stays on your own device.
-
Two companies use AI. One sorts incoming invoices, the other ranks job applicants. Why are the rules stricter for the second?
The AI Act sorts applications by what goes wrong for people when the AI gets it wrong. Size, price or personal data alone do not decide it.
-
Your company plans four AI projects. Which one lands in the high-risk class?
Hiring, staff assessment and credit are on the AI Act's high-risk list. Volume or audience does not decide it.
-
A manager says: 'For AI literacy, everyone needs a certificate.' What is true?
The law asks for measures, not a certificate. Recording what you did is how you show it.
-
Your managing director and your planners both use AI. How much training does each need?
The law names no hours and no curriculum. A director who approves AI needs different knowledge than a daily user.
-
An employee writes a client email with a private chat account. What is missing in any case?
A private account is an agreement between the person and the supplier. Your company has none, so no processing agreement.
-
A supplier says: 'We are EU-hosted.' What do you still check?
EU hosting answers one question: where the data is stored. Training and the agreement you check separately.
-
A supplier offers AI that 'tracks staff productivity'. What do you ask before anything else?
Tracking and judging staff usually makes a DPIA required. Ask before the pilot, not after.
-
Someone says: 'At minimal risk you can skip the approval step; the AI Act does not ask for it.' What is true?
At minimal risk the AI Act does not require it. It is still the step that protects you most.